Global Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market by Types, Devices, Industry Verticals, and Regions — Global Industry Analysis, Growth, Share, Size, Trends, and Forecast 2020–2026

The global graphics processing unit (GPU) market was valued at USD 38 billion in 2019 and is expected to reach USD 80 billion by 2026, expanding at a CAGR of around 30% during the forecast period, 2020–2026. The demand for graphics processing unit (GPU) is estimated to increase during the forecast period around the globe. The growing demand can be attributed to continuous changes made in graphic games, virtual reality, augmented reality and artificial intelligence. Internet of things market and electronics & wearables market are expected to create new lucrative opportunities for GPU in the industry.

Request for [email protected]

Graphic processing unit (GPU) is an electronic device designed to modify and deploy memory to accelerate image creation for display. The GPU industry enables seamless motion, complex optical effects, and intricate shapes to deliver enhanced images at a faster rate. Several independent tasks of enabling task-level parallelism and computation can simultaneously run using a GPU. By the prediction done by Moore’s law, the performance of GPUs has increased at a faster rate. The demand for increasingly complex entertainment applications and visual effects in entertainment and gaming applications is being met by using GPU.

Market Trends, Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities:

  • Increasing popularity of virtual reality in gaming industry is the major factor driving the growth of the market.
  • Extensive use of GPUs in portable electronic devices is gaining popularity in turn positively influencing its demand.
  • Growing smartphone-based games is contributing to the growth of the market.
  • To support cloud-based applications GPUs are being extensively adopted which is fuelling the market growth.
  • Increasing use of GPUs in healthcare applications is expected to influence the market growth during the forecast period.
  • Lack of technical expertise may act as a restrain to the growth of the market.
  • High GPU cost may hamper the market growth.

Ask for [email protected]

Competitive Landscape:

Major companies in the global graphics processing unit (GPU) market include NVIDIA Corporation, Qualcomm Incorporated, ARM Holdings PLC, Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation, Fujitsu Limited, Samsung Electronics, Apple Inc., Imagination Technologies Ltd., Sony Corporation, Broadcom Corporation, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Intel Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation, and International Business Machines Corporation. The competition in the global graphics processing unit (GPU) market is highly intense and competitors use strategies such as new product launches, collaborations, partnerships, ventures, acquisitions, and agreements to gain new market share.

The Global Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market has been segmented on the basis of


  • Dedicated
  • Integrated
  • Hybrid


  • Computers
  • Tablets
  • Smartphones
  • Gaming Consoles
  • Televisions
  • Others

Industry Verticals

  • Electronics
  • IT & Telecommunication
  • Defense & Intelligence
  • Media & Entertainment
  • Others


  • Asia Pacific
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Latin America

Enquiry Before [email protected]

Why Choose Us:

  • We offer industry-leading critical reports with accurate insights into the future of the market.
  • Our reports have been evaluated by some industry experts in the market, thus making them beneficial for the company’s to maximize their return on investments.
  • We provide a comprehensive pictorial representation of the information, strategic recommendations, outcomes of the analytical tools to offer an elaborate landscape, highlighting the key market players. This detailed assessment of the market will help the company increase efficiency.
  • The demand and supply dynamics offered in the report give a 360 degree view of the market.
  • Our report helps readers decipher the current and future constraints in the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market, and help them formulate optimum business strategies to maximize growth in the market.

Table of Contents

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Assumptions and Acronyms Used
  3. Research Methodology
  4.  Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Overview
  5. Global Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast by Type
  6. Global Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast by Application
  7. Global Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast by Sales Channel
  8. Global Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast by Region
  9. North Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast
  10. Latin Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast
  11. Europe Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast
  12. Asia Pacific Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast
  13. Middle East & Africa Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) Market Analysis and Forecast
  14. Competition Landscape

About DataIntelo:

DATAINTELO has set its benchmark in the market research industry by providing syndicated and customized research report to the clients. The database of the company is updated on a daily basis to prompt the clients with the latest trends and in-depth analysis of the industry. Our pool of database contains various industry verticals that include: IT & Telecom, Food Beverage, Automotive, Healthcare, Chemicals and Energy, Consumer foods, Food and beverages, and many more. Each and every report goes through the proper research methodology, validated from the professionals and analysts to ensure the eminent quality reports.

Contact Info:

Name: Alex Mathews

Address: 500 East E Street, Ontario,CA 91764, US.

Phone No: US: +1 909 545 6473 | IND: +91–7000061386

Email: [email protected]



About the author





You state in the first seven decades of UPA, the market grew at 8.4percent and 138 million people escaped poverty. What happened after?

The growth momentum of the initial seven decades has been remarkable, but markets have ups and downs and there has been a downward turn in the previous 3 decades. The worldwide recession following the Eurozone catastrophe in 2011 was just one explanatory factor, but the machine also conducted into national constraints. Regulatory constraints prevented big jobs from taking off. That problem continues today. Allegations of corruption later 2011 also shifted the political setting. From the time of this election, the disposition of the nation turned entirely against UPA.

Looking back, several positive improvements in the prior years were just swamped. Examine the telecom narrative. The CAG came up with hundreds of large estimates of earnings losses and general public opinion arrived at the opinion which not auctioning spectrum was a significant error. On the other hand, the encounter across the world wasn’t that stocks were the ideal way and in any instance, the TRAI hadn’t advocated auctions. I’ve said in the book that a few of the decisions taken in allocating licenses were suspicious but the actual question to ask was if the telecom coverage succeeded in its aim of expanding telecom accessibility. From this standpoint the coverage was an outstanding achievement but that was not brought out from the public discussion. The present government is fighting.

I agree that lots of the issues we face arise from the simple fact that our regulations and rules are extremely poorly drafted and are available to numerous interpretations. That can be true of environmental regulations and our taxation laws. We don’t put enough large excellent effort into converting policy aims into particular regulations which are transparent and clear. Regulations which can be translated in various manners are a recipe for most individuals hoping to control the rules while some assert that the rules are violated. It’s also a vicious circle which brings itself into allegations of corruption that then develop a life of their own.

Up to programs are involved, the NDA has more or less preserved almost all of the previous programmes although lots of them have been renamed and altered in some manners. The question to ask is if they’re being better executed. This requires plausible independent evaluation.

GST is a significant tax reform that was really put on the schedule from the UPA but at the point from the BJP ruled states. Be as it may, I think it’s great that the Constitution was amended to allow GST but I believe the design of the GST has mangled with much too many prices and hefty compliance duties on smaller businesses. Demonetization is referred to as a reform but in my opinion it was a negative development which inflicted a massive and unnecessary burden on the everyday business.

The bankruptcy and insolvency code is an essential reform. I hope it turns out to be a hit. The choice to increase import duties, together with the chance of further increases beforehand, is a significant change of this policy of slowly reducing import duties, that was in place for thirty decades and has been followed by numerous authorities including the Vajpayee government. It’s not in agreement with the aim of improving export functionality and linking international value chains.

I think it’s a shame the government hasn’t joined RCEP. Asia is the 1 portion of the planet where expansion is forecast to be high and that remains open. Not linking RCEP is a negation of this Act East policy that was supposed to substitute the Look East Policy. I believe you’re suggesting that the BJP was expected to become pro private business but it is not. As Amartya Sen has said, India does not actually have a real right-wing celebration in economical conditions.

From the Vodafone retrospective taxation instance, did not you counsel fund minister Pranab Mukherjee contrary to it?

I had been called in to provide a few thoughts to the budget. I used the chance to state that if we desired to alter the legislation prospectively there might be no objection however we shouldn’t do this retrospectively to conquer the Supreme Court judgement.

Is not the banking arrangement unchanged?

I’ve said in my novel that banking sector reform is a significant task ahead. We haven’t seen any significant reform of public business banking. The Reserve bank doesn’t have too much control over public sector banks because it will within private sector banks. This asymmetry vis a vis the private industry isn’t right.

The PJ Nayak committee had advocated that if decreasing government equity into a minority isn’t politically feasible the authorities share in public sector banks must be placed to a holding company. In the event the chairman of this lender isn’t beholden to some joint secretary inside the finance ministry he’ll behave otherwise. I believe that the time has come to recognise the waiver in the finance ministry provides no value to the quality of banks.

You’re the writer of an early reforms routine, the M record. What lessons can now’s policy makers learn from the expertise?

At the previous year of the Rajiv Gandhi government, we believed that the market wasn’t reacting as far as we believed it would into the reform efforts. I arrived to the conclusion that it was because we had been pushing human reform initiatives rather than pushing to get a core group of mutually encouraging reforms as a bundle. After V.P Singh became Prime Minister he requested me to prepare a paper suggesting an integrated reform package and that I ready a 34 page newspaper, which suggested a set of core reforms: reducing the financial deficit, liberalising industrial accreditation, decontrolling imports, and moving into a flexible exchange rate. The paper was discussed at a committee of secretaries. Some were completely contrary to it, while others were reassuring. It taught me that a definite statement concerning the management of reforms can encounter resistance but it may also meet with a great deal of support.

The V.P Singh government was not there for long enough to execute reforms but if the Narasimha Rao government came in, they had the ability to perform quite a good deal of what had been suggested in that newspaper. The major lesson I would draw would be that we must outline some of core reforms and permit them to be discussed so the pros and cons are fully debated.

RSS blogs